Reports R45997
Federal Regional Commissions and Authorities: Structural Features and Function
Published March 23, 2026 · Julie M. Lawhorn
Summary
This report describes the structure, activities, legislative history, and funding history of the 10 federal regional commissions and authorities. Those commissions are the
Appalachian Regional Commission;
Delta Regional Authority;
Denali Commission;
Great Lakes Authority;
Mid-Atlantic Regional Commission;
Northern Border Regional Commission;
Northern Great Plains Regional Authority;
Southern New England Regional Commission;
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission; and
Southwest Border Regional Commission.
Most of the regional commissions and authorities are modeled after the Appalachian Regional Commission structure, which is composed of a federal co-chair appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, and the member state governors, of which one is appointed the state co-chair. This structure is broadly replicated in the other commissions and authorities, albeit with notable variations and exceptions to local contexts. In addition, the service areas for all of the federal regional commissions and authorities are defined in statute and thus can only be amended or modified through congressional action. While the exact service areas have shifted over time, the general areas of service, as well as the services provided, have not changed significantly.
Of the 10 federal regional commissions and authorities, six could be considered active and functioning as of the date of publication: the Appalachian Regional Commission; the Delta Regional Authority; the Denali Commission; the Northern Border Regional Commission; the Southwest Border Regional Commission; and the Southeast Crescent Regional Commission. The Great Lakes Authority, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Commission, and the Southern New England Regional Commission are not yet active, and they do not have a confirmed federal co-chair. The funding authorization for the Northern Great Plans Regional Authority (NGPRA) lapsed at the end of FY2018 and it was not reauthorized until FY2025. The NGPRA also lacks a confirmed federal co-chair.
Seven of the authorized regional commissions and authorities each received $5 million to $200 million in annual appropriations in FY2026 for their various activities. Each of the six functioning regional commissions and authorities engage in economic development to varying extents, and address multiple programmatic activities in their respective service areas. These activities may include, but are not limited to, basic infrastructure; energy; ecology/environment and natural resources; workforce; and business development/entrepreneurship.
P.L. 119-74 provided FY2026 appropriations for a new Northwest Regional Commission, which—once established—would cover distressed areas of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. As of the date of this report, the commission has not been authorized.
Though they are federally chartered, receive congressional appropriations for their administration and activities, and include an appointed federal representative in their respective leadership structures (the federal co-chair and his/her alternate, as applicable), the federal regional commissions and authorities are quasi-governmental partnerships between the federal government and the constituent state(s) of a given authority or commission. This partnership structure includes substantial input and efforts at the sub-state level, and represents a unique federal approach to economic development.
The federal regional commissions and authorities provide a model of functioning economic development approaches that are place-based, intergovernmental, and multifaceted in their programmatic orientation (e.g., infrastructure, energy, environment/ecology, workforce, business development).
Topics
Economic DevelopmentU.S. Economy